If we make social housing, is designed specifically for the needs of Offenbach's citizens. Residential counseling centers have repeatedly pointed out the policy: for Offenbacher are low income there are not enough residential services. CDU and FDP are wrong when they fear that new offerings would Frankfurt to Offenbach move welfare recipients. This is very unlikely - Frankfurt offers much more than welfare recipients Offenbach. The Frankfurt Card received social assistance as highly subsidized public transport prices and discounts on leisure activities such as zoo, skating rink and indoor swimming pools. Such support can Offenbacher budget situation does not apply. The subsidized housing has
with the social housing in the 60's have little in common. The reasoning of the FDP, private providers could guarantee favorable rents as offers of subsidized housing, is true, but often these homes have serious shortcomings and are still under the Minimum standard, so that healthy living can not be guaranteed. This is particularly problematic for families with children.
It is indisputable that has been discussed for some time, subsidized housing to be mixed with private housing. Unfortunately, it has become everyday life for the CDU, permanent scandals provoke rather than to provide substantive work. It would be nice if the CDU would have the force of its own urban design concepts submitted, rather than the mayor to work.
Stephen Dyer and Peppler Ulla, 05/17/2010
0 comments:
Post a Comment